Accessibility Industry Update: September 2026
From the Desk of the Editor
AI is becoming an integral part of accessibility work. This month, we summarize new research from Level Access on how organizations are using it. We also have quick updates on the WCAG-EM Report Tool, the growing capabilities of native HTML, recent legal developments, and a fresh reading list.
Standing Notes
If you are new here, welcome. We compile this update every month to keep you informed on the changing landscape of digital accessibility. Whether you are a developer, product manager, QA specialist, leader, or somewhere in between, we want to give you the context you need to stay in the know.
As always, reach out if you think we missed something, or share the link with your colleagues or partners who may benefit from some or all of this information. You can also sign up to receive these accessibility updates via email.
– The QualityLogic Editorial Team
What’s Inside
- The WCAG-EM Report Tool – No Longer Just for Web
- Did You Know? HTML Can Do That Now
- Findings from the 2026 State of Digital Accessibility Report
- Legal Stuff
- Upcoming Conferences and Events
- What We’ve Been Reading
- Jobs and Opportunities
The WCAG-EM Report Tool – No Longer Just for Web
W3C updated their WCAG-EM Report Tool, a free in-browser application that helps auditors create, edit, and ultimately export comprehensive accessibility reports, to align its language and workflow with WCAG-EM 2.0. It now uses words like digital products, views, and sample sets instead of web sites/pages, which makes it possible to record findings from apps, kiosks, and documents.
Did You Know? HTML Can Do That Now
You’ve probably heard it before. “Why are we using a custom component?” “No ARIA is better than bad ARIA.” We should be minimizing the number of custom components that we build, because built-in HTML versions will almost always outperform them (accessibility wise) out of the box.
There was a time when this didn’t work in practice, because HTML was lacking in features.
Chris Burnell’s concise resource, HTML Can Do That?, shows this is no longer the case. Native HTML can now handle interactions that once led straight to custom JavaScript. Popovers, declarative dialog controls, mutually exclusive disclosure widgets, lazy loading, and content revealed by browser search are now among the things that are easier to get right than ever before.
Findings from the 2026 State of Digital Accessibility Report
The Eighth Annual State of Digital Accessibility Report surveyed 2,530 professionals worldwide. Since 97% worked at organizations with at least 1,000 employees, the results primarily reflect large organizations and participant perceptions.
A few findings stand out:
- AI is accelerating creation faster than testing. Among the 80% using AI for accessibility, 99% said it accelerated at least one development stage. Design reached 61% and planning 58%, while quality assurance and testing reached 30%. Only 6% reported spending less on accessibility, and 89% said close human involvement remains critical.
- Mature programs get more from AI. Organizations with governance, training, and a culture of accessibility were nearly six times as likely to say AI helps prioritize issues and nearly three times as likely to say it supports proactive work. Established processes help teams turn AI output into action.
- Formal programs do not always change operations. Accountability reached 97%, policy adoption reached 91%, and training reached 89%. Yet only 60% said their policy has a major operational effect, while 49% considered their training highly effective. Competing priorities remain the leading obstacle.
- U.S. legal pressure rose sharply. Globally, 53% reported legal or regulatory action, consistent with last year. The U.S. figure climbed 19 points to 72%, while Europe fell from 55% to 34%. Among organizations with highly supportive executives, 72% reported a lawsuit and 77% reported regulatory contact. The survey does not establish causation, but leadership support appears to follow legal pressure.
- Accessibility is becoming part of purchasing and performance. Some 83% require accessibility most or all of the time when purchasing digital products, up from 75%. Another 84% see it as a competitive advantage. Among organizations tracking fewer customer complaints, 96% said that measure improved through their accessibility efforts.
The report points to an execution gap. Policies, training, accountable leaders, and AI tools are widespread. Mature governance and effective processes determine whether those investments change outcomes.
Legal Stuff
The August legal update from Converge Accessibility illustrates how much website accessibility cases still depend on jurisdiction and facts. A Pennsylvania federal court dismissed a case against GoDaddy because the online service lacked the physical place connection required under Third Circuit precedent. A New York court dismissed another case at summary judgment after finding that the plaintiff did not show a credible intent to return. In Florida, however, a blind tester received a default judgment under more permissive Eleventh Circuit standards. The lesson here is that similar barriers can produce very different outcomes depending on where a case is filed, whether there is intent to return, and the alleged inconvenience.
Federally speaking, the Department of Justice’s 2026 regulatory agenda mentions that they will be considering changes that could make parts of the Title II web accessibility rule less burdensome, possibly through a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Obviously, this means nothing until the changes are actually announced or put forward for review, but we expect to see action on this before the deadlines go into force in 2027.
At the state level, Missouri’s SB 907 (regarding Abusive Website or Web Content Access Litigation) took effect on August 28. California’s AB 649 did not advance before the legislative deadline.
Separately, a Department of Labor final rule on Section 503 takes effect on September 21. It removes the 7% federal contractor utilization goal and disability data collection requirements. The underlying prohibition on disability discrimination remains unchanged.
Upcoming Conferences and Events
- Inclusive Design 24, September 24, 2026, online: A free, 24-hour global event sharing inclusive design ideas across design, development, planning, and practice. Sessions stream publicly on YouTube with no registration required.
- M-Enabling Summit, October 5 to 7, 2026, Arlington, Virginia: This year’s program covers accessible digital transformation, policy, inclusive technology, testing, AI, and accessibility program management. Expect a large public sector audience.
- WordPress Accessibility Day, October 7 to 8, 2026, online: A free, 24-hour global livestream about website accessibility for WordPress developers, designers, content creators, and users.
- GAConf USA, October 19 to 20, 2026, online: A free conference where disabled players and members of the game industry discuss recent work in game accessibility.
- ASSETS 2026, October 25 to 28, 2026, Porto, Portugal, and online: The ACM SIGACCESS conference presents research on accessible computing for people with disabilities and older adults.
- Accessing Higher Ground, November 16 to 20, 2026, Denver, Colorado: A conference focused on accessible media, web, and technology, with particular relevance to higher education.
- TechShare Pro, November 18 to 19, 2026, London and online: AbilityNet’s conference covers accessibility and disability inclusion, with 2026 themes including responsible AI, financial inclusion, culture change, and technology for social good. Online tickets are free.
What We’ve Been Reading
Here is a list of the articles and posts that we found particularly informative and/or interesting this month.
- Should a Dialog Close When Clicked Outside? – Adrian Roselli: There is no universal answer. The right behavior depends on the task, user expectations, the risk of losing work, and whether recovery is easy. Roselli also tests the edge cases that become especially important for people with motor disabilities.
- Evaluating a Success Criterion – Adrian Roselli: A practical research order for difficult WCAG questions. Start with the normative text, then move through understanding documents, techniques, public working group discussions, informed commentary, and direct testing.
- Your accessibility tests stop at the page. Your users don’t – AFixt: Page scans cannot tell you whether a multistep task remains accessible across changing states. Karl Groves makes the case for executable use cases built around roles, accessible names, meaningful assertions, error handling, and regression testing.
- Bold is not the same as <strong> – A11y with Diana: Visual bolding and semantic importance are different jobs. This short guide explains when to use CSS, strong, and b with comments on assistive technology support.
- How long does it take to remediate accessibility audit findings? – Inclusion Impact: Mark Miller offers a useful starting estimate of two to six hours per finding, then explains why scope, complexity, team skill, and capacity can move that number considerably.
- Summer Disability Readings – The Accessible Link: Christiane Link shares a varied disability summer reading list touching on the ways that accessibility work is impacted by history, culture, policy, and lived experience.
- Does this menu work with keyboard? The surprising number of big brands that fail – A11yBlog: Chris Yoong uses a simple keyboard test to examine focus order and visible focus on major brand sites. The sample is informal, but the failures are easy for anyone to reproduce.
- Here to Stay, Here to Grow – NASCIO: This national portrait of state digital accessibility officers finds that 40 of 56 states and territories have an accessibility lead. 67% reported no designated budget, 34% had no dedicated testing staff, and 69% lacked enough resources to remediate every statewide site and application.
- WCAG 3 update – conformance – Alastair Campbell: Campbell explains the current direction for WCAG 3 conformance, including a core level and additional reporting tiers.
- WCAG 3’s road to hell is paved with supplemental requirements – Eric Eggert: Eggert challenges the proposed optional requirements and reporting tiers, arguing that they may add complexity without giving users clearer information.
Jobs and Opportunities
QualityLogic does not explicitly endorse these companies. Should you decide to seek a position with one of them, please perform your own due diligence.
- Digital Accessibility Program Manager – Stanford University – Redwood City, CA (Remote)
- Content Accessibility Lead – College Board – Remote
- Senior Digital Accessibility Manager at the University of South Carolina – Columbia, SC
- Accessibility Technology Analyst I at the University of North Florida – Jacksonville, FL
- Front End Developer and 508 Compliance Specialist at Captivation Software – Annapolis Junction, MD
Looking for more opportunities? Check out A11yJobs, Indeed, and LinkedIn.
Thanks for Reading!
That’s a wrap for this month.